Responsa for Bava Batra 348:11
לסוף איגלאי מילתא דכהן הוא אמר אביי היינו דאמרי אינשי בתר עניא אזלא עניותא
an Israelite,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who knows the law that before calling upon the guarantor to pay, the creditor must first approach the debtor. Hence it is possible that valuables might have been deposited with him by the debtor. ');"><sup>30</sup></span> but [in the case of] a Gentile, since he [invariably] goes [for payment] to the guarantor<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra 173b. ');"><sup>31</sup></span> [the possibility that] bundles [of valuables were deposited with the creditor] need not be taken into consideration.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As the debtor well knows that the gentile would, in any case, exact payment from the guarantor, who would not entrust him with any valuables which would only enable the gentile to collect the debt twice. ');"><sup>32</sup></span>
Teshuvot Maharam
A. Since B's mother did not take the required oath regarding her ketubah, she had no property of her own; even the clothes she wore on week-days belonged to the estate. Consequently B is unable to carry out his mother's instructions. B is under no moral obligation to repay his mother's debt since the mother herself had not been pressed for payment.
SOURCES: Cr. 76.